Ontario eclipses Michigan in auto production - 07/16/05 Error processing SSI file
Error processing SSI file
Error processing SSI file

         

Saturday, July 16, 2005

Image
Al Goldis, File / Associated Press

Cadillac vehicles move along the line at the Lansing Grand River assembly plant. For decades, Michigan has been the undisputed king of car and truck production in North America. But Michigan lost its lead in 2004 to neighboring Ontario, Canada.

Chasing Canada

Ontario eclipses Michigan in auto production

Many factors give Canada an advantage in global competition

Top 10 North American vehicle producers

A look at the top North American vehicle-producing states and provinces. Figures include actual production for 1985, 1995 and 2004 and projected production for 2008. All numbers are in thousands.

1985

1. Michigan 3,285.8

2. Ohio 1,993.9

3. Ontario, Canada 1,750.3

4. Missouri 1,234.9

5. Georgia 621.6

6. Wisconsin 497.0

7. Kentucky 477.0

8. Illinois 459.9

9. Delaware 336.4

10. Texas 309.8

Other 3,061.2

Total 14,027.8

1995

1. Michigan 3,103.2

2. Ontario 2,231.8

3. Ohio 1,979.8

4. Kentucky 991.3

5. Missouri 885.8

6. Tennessee 779.6

7. Illinois 732.1

8. Indiana 411.1

9. California 352.7

10. Delaware 343.9

Other 3,526.7

Total 15,338.0

2004

1. Ontario 2,701.2

2. Michigan 2,598.4

3. Ohio 1,818.5

4. Missouri 1,226.3

5. Kentucky 1,162.8

6. Indiana 772.6

7. Tennessee 713.8

8. Coahuila, Mexico 410.4

9. Illinois 396.8

10. Georgia 395.7

Other 4,027.4

Total 16,224.0

2008

1. Ontario 3,058.9

2. Michigan 2,433.6

3. Ohio 1,814.5

4. Kentucky 1,183.9

5. Missouri 970.1

6. Indiana 768.4

7. Alabama 751.4

8. Tennessee 684.8

9. Illinois 530.5

10. Puebla, Mexico 434.4

Other 4,353.1

Total 16,983.6

Source: WardsAuto.com

Ontario vs. Michigan at a glance

Advantages for Ontario and Michigan in competing for auto-related jobs:

Michigan

Capacity: Michigan factories had the ability to build 3.39 million vehicles in 2004 compared with 2.87 million for Ontario -- the equivalent of two assembly plants.

Industry concentration: Michigan has 19 vehicle assembly plants, dozens of powertrain, stamping and components plants, hundreds of tooling businesses, more than 800 parts suppliers and over 360 labs and research facilities dedicated to industrial and manufacturing technologies.

Education: Universities specialize in areas such as automotive engineering and materials specialists; community colleges are set up to retrain workers to keep up with skills needed by automakers and suppliers.

Geography: Virtually the entire Canadian auto sector and about 60 percent of all U.S. light vehicle assembly plants and a majority of supplier plants are within a 400-mile radius of Detroit.

Efficiency: Two of North America's 10 most productive auto assembly plants are in Michigan.

Ontario

Growing Japanese brands: Honda Motor Co. is now Ontario's third largest automaker, and Toyota Motor Corp. is planning to open a new plant in 2007 in Woodstock. It already operates one in Cambridge.

Lower health care costs: The Canadian Auto Workers union estimates the savings amounts to $4 per hour per worker versus the United States.

Lower taxes: Ontario's government says its combined provincial and federal corporate income tax for manufacturing is 4 percent below the U.S. average.

Lower parts costs: The 2004 KPMG Competitive Alternatives report shows that Ontario's auto parts manufacturing costs are 6.4 percent lower than U.S. costs.

Efficiency: Two of North America's 10 most productive auto assembly plants are in Ontario.

Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Michigan Economic Development Corp., WardsAuto.com, Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, Harbour Consulting, Detroit Free Press, Canadian Auto Workers, KPMG.

Auto-related facts for Michigan, Ontario

Michigan:

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis estimates that motor vehicle, body, trailer and parts manufacturing contributed $39.3 billion to the gross state product in 2003 through direct employment. That was about 10 percent of Michigan's GSP.

Motor vehicle research and development amounts to $10.3 billion a year.

In the past three-and-a-half years, the Big Three have invested $9 billion upgrading plants or building new ones.

Manufacturing employment in the state's auto industry is around 252,000, with 81,000 employed in assembly operations and 171,000 in parts-making.

The state has 10.1 million people and a total area of 97,990 square miles.

Ontario:

The automotive industry is the largest manufacturing sector in the province by gross domestic product, accounting for about 20 percent of total manufacturing output and 4 percent of total Ontario GDP.

In 2004, the value of shipments for auto manufacturing in Canada reached Canadian $102.8 billion ($71.1 billion for assembly, $31.7 billion for parts.)

Capital expenditures in the sector across Canada in 2004 were about Canadian $4 billion including new capital and repair capital. All of Canada's light vehicle assembly capacity and more than 90 percent of its auto parts manufacturing are located in Ontario.

Production employment in the province's auto industry is around 138,000, with just under 48,000 employed in assembly operations and 90,000 in parts manufacturing.

_The province has 12.4 million people and a total area of 1.1 million square kilometers (about 440,000 square miles.)

Source: Michigan Economic Development Corp.; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Trade; Ontario government Web site.

Comment on this story
Send this story to a friend
Get Home Delivery

LANSING -- Ever since the first Model Ts rolled off Henry Ford's assembly line, Detroit and its surroundings have been the capital of the U.S. auto industry. But now, thanks to cheap health care and changing tastes in cars, its Canadian neighbor is challenging it for the title of North America's top producer.

Michigan last year alone built roughly 2.6 million Chevrolet Silverados, Ford Mustangs, Jeep Grand Cherokees and a host of other models. But that wasn't enough to hold off neighboring Ontario, Canada, long a car-building center but largely in Detroit's shadow. Separated from Michigan by lakes Huron, St. Clair and Superior and an occasional river, Ontario produced nearly 103,000 more vehicles than Michigan last year.

Model changeovers -- which forced Michigan plants to close for part of 2004 to retool for producing new models -- are partly to blame, according to WardsAuto.com, which tracks industry trends. But there are other, more complicated factors at play, such as health care costs and chronic market-share declines for Detroit's Big Three automakers, experts say.

Detroit's Big Three -- General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group -- have shed thousands of jobs and closed U.S. plants to remain competitive while foreign automakers beefed up operations in Ontario.

"If it was Ford gaining at the expense of GM, it wouldn't matter," said Thomas Klier, senior economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. But it's companies such as Toyota Motors Corp. and Honda Motor Co. that are growing, he said, and they're growing outside Michigan.

"It comes down to geography," said Klier.

Even in Canada, the Big Three face issues with their unionized workers that their nonunionzed foreign competitors largely sidestep. GM, Ford and Chrysler hope during talks beginning next week that they'll be able to negotiate new contracts with the Canadian Auto Workers that will help them trim costs.

But CAW President Buzz Hargrove already has told his members the CAW won't accept calls to cut growth in wages, benefits and pensions during negotiations. There's increasing tension and widening perspectives on whether cutbacks are necessary at Big Three operations in Ontario.

No such problems plague Toyota, which two weeks ago announced it will open a $650 million assembly plant by 2007 in Woodstock, Ontario to build up to 100,000 small sport utility vehicles a year, saying it chose Ontario in part because of growing demand for SUVs in that region.

Skyrocketing U.S. health care bills, which the Big Three cite as one of their biggest obstacles for competing with foreign automakers, are another factor.

Canada is attractive because it subsidizes much of workers' health care tabs, said Jim Donaldson, vice president for business development at the Michigan Economic Development Corp. He noted health care expenses for GM's current and retired U.S. workers add about $1,400 to every vehicle it makes.

"If all other costs are similar, that would be one of the things that would favor building in Canada," Donaldson said.

Ontario's success also is tied to a Canadian $500 million fund the province created to attract automotive projects. In the past year alone, Ford, GM, Toyota and others have committed to Canadian $5 billion in new investments in the province.

Ontario also is working hard to attract more research and development and has established a new engineering degree specifically for the automotive field.

"We're trying to put our auto sector on the most competitive footing for the next generation of products and the next generation of worker education," said Joseph Cordiano, Ontario's minister of economic development and trade.

Michigan already touts a concentration of auto-related businesses, a well-trained work force and an education system set up to turn out automotive engineers, materials specialists and designers and to train workers for sophisticated manufacturing jobs.

The state has created a seven-point strategy that includes attracting international automotive investment and helping domestic companies develop international business strategies.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm has drawn up a business tax proposal that would lower manufacturers' bills and she and other state officials are aggressively pursuing foreign auto-related firms and suppliers.

"It's not the same world as it was 10, 20, 30 years ago. We need to take advantage of the global economy," Granholm said in an interview with The Associated Press.

For the moment, Michigan has regained the lead over Ontario in motor-vehicle manufacturing and it might hold the edge for the rest of the year. But WardsAuto.com expects Ontario to retake the title in the next few years.

Still, Michigan has its success stories. GM next year will open a new assembly plant west of Lansing that will employ up to 3,000 workers, replacing century-old Lansing plants that closed this spring. And DaimlerChrysler this fall will begin making a new generation of four-cylinder engines at a $700 million plant in Dundee, southwest of Detroit.

The state scored a victory earlier this year when Toyota committed to building a $150 million R&D center near Ann Arbor after Granholm and the Michigan Legislature helped secure land for the deal. The state also granted a tax credit worth $38.9 million.

"If you want to expand your technical research, you have to be in Michigan because that's where most of the engineers are," said Dennis Cuneo, senior vice president for Toyota Motor North America. "That type of thing builds on itself."

Despite the fierce competition, Ontario and Michigan officials say they're happier to see new auto-related work go to each other than to states in the South because it lifts the region's overall economy.

"We are our biggest trading partners and each others' biggest allies," Cordiano said. "We never forget that."

On the Net:

Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth: http://www.michigan.gov/dleg

Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Trade: http://www.ontariocanada.com/ontcan/en/home.jsp


         


 Autos Insider 



Copyright © 2005
The Detroit News.
Use of this site indicates your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated 12/19/2002).

Error processing SSI file