LANSING -- Will Michigan ban all wine shipments or allow a couple dozen cases to be shipped to individual residents each year?
That question remains unsettled in the wake of a May U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said states can allow or prohibit home deliveries of wine, but they must treat in-state and out-of-state wineries the same. As it stands, in-state wineries are shipping their product to state residents, out-of-state wine producers and distributors are not.
A House bill would eliminate all shipments of wine, the position advocated by the Beer and Wine Wholesalers, which spent more than $400,000 on campaign contributions to lawmakers last year. A Senate bill would allow individuals to take delivery of 24 cases a year, the stance preferred by owners of the state's 32 wineries, who have the ear of legislators in northern and southwestern Michigan, where they're located.
Gov. Jennifer Granholm has said she would like to see a compromise under which some shipments are permitted. The issue is expected to be hot when lawmakers return to a full schedule next month.
"We've been meeting with legislators on our side," said Bill Nowling, a spokesman for the Beer and Wine Wholesalers.
"It comes down to whether lawmakers think the current three-tiered system of liquor distribution in the state works. If you allow direct shipments of wine, you take the state out of the control process. There's no way to regulate it. And it's just a matter of time before liquor distributors and producers will want to go direct."
Sen. Michelle McManus, R-Lake Leelanau, sponsor of the bill that would allow wine shipments, has several wineries in her district. She says they rely on direct shipments for a large chunk of their sales.
"It's critical for the Michigan wine industry to allow some sort of compromise," she said.
"An outright ban would be a killer to their business. That would be damaging to both agriculture and tourism in this state."
You can reach Mark Hornbeck at (313) 222-2470 or mhornbeck@detnews.com.